Questions DeserveClear Answers.

Verity Forensic Trace is a Liechtenstein-based independent consultancy providing blockchain forensic investigations, cryptocurrency asset tracing, smart contract analysis and digital asset recovery advisory services.

We support eligible private individuals, businesses, legal professionals and institutional organisations.

Our registered address is:

We consider enquiries from eligible clients internationally, subject to applicable laws, sanctions restrictions and the scope of our services.

No. We operate as an independent investigative and advisory consultancy, not as a cryptocurrency exchange.

No. We do not provide cryptocurrency custody services.

No. We are an independent consultancy and do not exercise governmental or law enforcement authority.

Blockchain forensics involves examining blockchain transaction records, address activity and relevant technical information to reconstruct digital asset movements and investigate cryptocurrency-related incidents.

Many public blockchain transactions can be examined using publicly accessible records. The extent of analysis depends on the blockchain network, transaction structure and available evidence.

Blockchain records may reveal transaction relationships or connections to identifiable services. Establishing the real-world identity of a wallet controller generally requires additional reliable evidence.

Relevant transaction identifiers, public wallet addresses, blockchain network details and supporting documentation may assist an investigation.

Yes. Relevant activity across supported blockchain networks may be examined where technically feasible.

Technical reports may assist legal professionals in evaluating blockchain evidence. Their admissibility and evidential weight depend on applicable law and procedural requirements.

Many cryptocurrency movements recorded on public blockchains can be examined through transaction records.

Tracing capabilities depend on the relevant blockchain network, transaction mechanisms and available evidence.

In many circumstances, identifiable cryptocurrency movements associated with reported theft can be examined.

However, tracing assets does not guarantee recovery.

Public blockchain analysis may reveal identifiable transfers involving multiple addresses.

The extent of tracing depends on the transaction structure and available information.

Public blockchain records may identify transactions involving addresses associated with cryptocurrency exchanges.

Further tracing within custodial platforms may require information that is not publicly available.

Certain cross-chain movements can be examined through identifiable bridge transactions and other observable blockchain activity.

No. Public wallet addresses and transaction identifiers are generally sufficient to begin an assessment.

Yes. Available blockchain records and supporting documentation may be examined to reconstruct relevant transaction activity.

Yes. A platform may display balances or investment profits that do not correspond to actual cryptocurrency holdings.

Independent blockchain verification may help establish whether relevant transactions occurred.

We examine available transaction records associated with reported unauthorised transfers and document identifiable asset movements.

Relevant blockchain transactions and supporting communications may be examined as part of an investigation.

We consider cases involving reported recovery-related fraud, including suspicious payment requests, misleading representations and associated cryptocurrency transfers.

Blockchain analysis may identify relevant transaction relationships or potential service interactions.

Establishing the identity of individuals generally requires additional reliable evidence and may involve competent authorities.

Recovery may be possible in certain circumstances, but it cannot be guaranteed.

Outcomes depend on factors including asset accessibility, available evidence, applicable legal procedures and relevant service-provider cooperation.

No. Asset tracing and asset recovery are separate processes.

Tracing may identify transaction pathways, while recovery may require additional legal or institutional action.

Confirmed blockchain transactions generally cannot be reversed unilaterally.

Certain services or protocols may have specific administrative mechanisms, but these depend on the relevant circumstances and authority.

Certain custodial service providers may be able to restrict assets or accounts where legally permitted and technically possible.

Such decisions are subject to applicable laws and the provider’s procedures.

No. We provide investigative and advisory services but do not guarantee recovery outcomes.

There is no universal blockchain requirement to deposit additional cryptocurrency to unlock allegedly recovered funds.

Requests for unexpected payments, validation deposits or network activation fees should be independently verified.

Legitimate professional service fees, where applicable, should be disclosed through written engagement terms.

Some matters may be resolved through appropriate service-provider procedures or other lawful mechanisms.

Other cases may require legal action, and some assets may not be recoverable.

A smart contract is a program deployed on a blockchain network that executes defined operations when invoked through supported mechanisms.

Yes. Publicly available contract information, transaction records and execution data may be examined to understand relevant contract behaviour.

Smart contracts can execute token transfers or other operations when their programmed conditions and relevant authorisations permit.

Some legitimate protocols require transaction fees or other defined payments.

However, claims that additional deposits are necessary to release unrelated cryptocurrency balances should be independently verified against the actual contract and applicable network rules.

Yes. Some fraudulent schemes involve malicious contract mechanisms, deceptive applications or misleading representations about contract functionality.

Confirmed blockchain transactions generally cannot be reversed unilaterally.

Specific administrative mechanisms may exist in certain protocols, depending on their design.

Relevant contract interactions involving these token standards may be examined according to the technical scope of the engagement.

You can submit an enquiry through the designated case-assessment or contact section of our website.

Useful information may include:

• A description of the incident
• Relevant transaction identifiers
• Public wallet addresses
• Blockchain network details
• Supporting screenshots
• Relevant communications
• Other available documentation

No. An initial enquiry may begin with a summary of the incident and available transaction information.

Additional documentation may be requested where relevant.

The available information is reviewed to determine the nature of the matter and potential investigative requirements.

If an engagement is appropriate, the proposed scope and terms can be discussed.

An authorised representative may submit an enquiry where appropriate.

Additional information may be required to establish the representative’s authority.

Yes. Relevant multi-network matters may be considered according to the technical scope of the investigation.

The availability and cost of an initial assessment depend on the company’s current service arrangements.

Any applicable assessment fee should be disclosed before a paid service begins.

Fees depend on the nature and complexity of the matter, the investigative scope and the services required.

Applicable fees should be communicated through the proposed engagement terms.

Refund conditions depend on the applicable engagement agreement and relevant legal requirements.

Clients should review the terms before proceeding.

Any applicable fee structure must be defined in the written engagement terms.

The company does not guarantee recovery outcomes.

Investigation timelines depend on transaction complexity, the number of relevant addresses, blockchain networks involved and available evidence.

Urgent enquiries may be considered according to the nature of the matter and available operational capacity.

No timeframe is guaranteed unless expressly agreed.

Certain matters may involve independent legal, administrative or other third-party expenses.

Any anticipated costs should be explained where known and agreed as appropriate.

Client information is handled according to applicable confidentiality obligations, engagement terms and privacy requirements.

Certain disclosures may be required by law.

No. Our investigative services do not require cryptocurrency private keys.

No. Clients should never disclose wallet recovery phrases as part of an investigative enquiry.

Yes. Public wallet addresses are commonly used for blockchain analysis.

However, they may still be associated with personal information and should be shared through appropriate channels.

No. We do not provide cryptocurrency custody services.

Applicable data-protection laws may provide rights to request deletion, subject to relevant legal obligations and exceptions.

Use the contact information published on the company’s official website to independently verify unexpected communications or payment requests.

We consider enquiries internationally, subject to applicable laws, sanctions restrictions, client eligibility and the scope of our services.

Service availability may be restricted by applicable sanctions, regulatory requirements or internal eligibility policies.

Many investigative activities may be conducted remotely.

Any requirements for in-person meetings depend on the nature of the engagement.

Relevant public blockchain activity may be examined regardless of the location of an associated service provider.

Access to non-public information remains subject to applicable laws and appropriate authority.

No. Decisions by competent authorities and third-party organisations remain outside our control.

We consider engagements involving legal professionals requiring blockchain forensic analysis and technical documentation.

Technical findings may assist legal professionals in evaluating evidence.

Admissibility and evidential weight depend on the relevant jurisdiction and procedural requirements.

We do not possess independent legal authority to freeze assets.

Certain service providers or competent authorities may take action where legally permitted.

We do not have unrestricted access to confidential exchange records.

Disclosure of non-public information depends on applicable law, provider procedures and relevant authority.

No. Legal representation must be provided by appropriately qualified professionals.

We consider legitimate corporate engagements involving blockchain transaction analysis, digital asset incidents and technical investigative reporting.